nete_aruna
06-25 05:02 PM
Any one Need dr. appointment for 29th june in and around Cincinnati, ohio let me know.
wallpaper girl red dragon tattoo
ksrk
09-29 06:28 PM
At this time we have created a tool for our members to compare both data provided by USCIS and see its results. The basic difference is as follows:
FOIA / USCIS
EB2C- 4111 / 19,333
EB2I - 9117 / 47,728
EB2M - 26 / 211
EB2P - 82 / 510
EB2R - 1716 / 7,150
EB3C - 1166 / 6,343
EB3I - 8681 / 62,607
EB3M -- 657 / 7,878
EB3P 1624 / 11,563
EB3R - 5779 / 62,840
Thank you for your support
Team IV
The two sets of data are off by an order of magnitude (or more)!!! How incompetent can the USCIS be that they publish two sets of data with such large discrepancies??!!
Seriously, words fail me...maybe this will help express myself better... ^$#&%$(*^%#@!$#@%)!!!
Estimates (just for kicks) by the two methods are as far apart as over 2yrs!
Anyways, it is a start - there is some hazy view now vs. absolute darkness before - certainly kudos to IV's efforts for this.
Good luck to everyone!
FOIA / USCIS
EB2C- 4111 / 19,333
EB2I - 9117 / 47,728
EB2M - 26 / 211
EB2P - 82 / 510
EB2R - 1716 / 7,150
EB3C - 1166 / 6,343
EB3I - 8681 / 62,607
EB3M -- 657 / 7,878
EB3P 1624 / 11,563
EB3R - 5779 / 62,840
Thank you for your support
Team IV
The two sets of data are off by an order of magnitude (or more)!!! How incompetent can the USCIS be that they publish two sets of data with such large discrepancies??!!
Seriously, words fail me...maybe this will help express myself better... ^$#&%$(*^%#@!$#@%)!!!
Estimates (just for kicks) by the two methods are as far apart as over 2yrs!
Anyways, it is a start - there is some hazy view now vs. absolute darkness before - certainly kudos to IV's efforts for this.
Good luck to everyone!
same_old_guy
01-31 02:04 PM
You should be little more respectful when speaking about H4 issue. Your words are very offensive to me and people like me in this forum. The news does not say anything about non-working spouse in any place. It just implies ITIN = illegal immigrant
QUOTE - "A mini-brushfire broke out in the Capitol Wednesday as members realized that the decision to refund tax payments to ITIN holders meant illegal immigrants could possibly benefit."
"House Minority Leader John Boehner insisted illegal immigrants would not benefit because they generally don't use ITINs to file tax returns since the very use of ITINs indicates the return may have been filed by an illegal immigrant."
It is unfortunate that H4 is mixed up in this. Bottom-line is this - if an non-working american spouse should get the rebate, a legal H4 spouse should also get the check. I think we all agree to that.
yabadaba, give us one reason why you dont agree ? Because to me IRS treats an H1 and citizen exactly same way. Why should they treat their respective spouses differently ?
H4 my not qualify for... 01-31-2008 01:34 PM
H4 my not qualify for... 01-31-2008 12:36 PM I think it's idiotic.
H4 my not qualify for... 01-31-2008 12:09 PM H4 are joint tax filers, you dumb ass.
H4 my not qualify for... 01-31-2008 09:01 AM idiotic response
thanks guys for the red dots and your flattering comments. Shows that a person cannot have an alternate point of view with regards to taxes. As I said before to eb3_nepa, with regards to taxes, its my view and mine alone. I never said it was universally fair, I just said its fair for me.
QUOTE - "A mini-brushfire broke out in the Capitol Wednesday as members realized that the decision to refund tax payments to ITIN holders meant illegal immigrants could possibly benefit."
"House Minority Leader John Boehner insisted illegal immigrants would not benefit because they generally don't use ITINs to file tax returns since the very use of ITINs indicates the return may have been filed by an illegal immigrant."
It is unfortunate that H4 is mixed up in this. Bottom-line is this - if an non-working american spouse should get the rebate, a legal H4 spouse should also get the check. I think we all agree to that.
yabadaba, give us one reason why you dont agree ? Because to me IRS treats an H1 and citizen exactly same way. Why should they treat their respective spouses differently ?
H4 my not qualify for... 01-31-2008 01:34 PM
H4 my not qualify for... 01-31-2008 12:36 PM I think it's idiotic.
H4 my not qualify for... 01-31-2008 12:09 PM H4 are joint tax filers, you dumb ass.
H4 my not qualify for... 01-31-2008 09:01 AM idiotic response
thanks guys for the red dots and your flattering comments. Shows that a person cannot have an alternate point of view with regards to taxes. As I said before to eb3_nepa, with regards to taxes, its my view and mine alone. I never said it was universally fair, I just said its fair for me.
2011 This makes dragon tattoos some
whattodo
01-31 02:33 PM
Yabadaba, only if closed mind came with closed mouth, none of us will have any problem. You cannot think outside our own situation. I bet you would be pretty opposed to idea of H4 not receiving tax rebate if your wife was in H4. Secondly, if you dont have kids, you have no right to comment of people who have them. I think if someone is desperate for a job and still decides to sit at home to take care of their kids, we should really respect them for the sacrifice.
Come on, open your mind or else close your mouth too. :)
then u need to get a thicker skin. its an open forum with opinions flying back and forth....its nothing to do with immigrants rights. its to do with taxes...i m sorry if some of the spouses have been left out in this process, but again I feel that its fair. end of story.
Come on, open your mind or else close your mouth too. :)
then u need to get a thicker skin. its an open forum with opinions flying back and forth....its nothing to do with immigrants rights. its to do with taxes...i m sorry if some of the spouses have been left out in this process, but again I feel that its fair. end of story.
more...
sunny1000
05-24 11:11 AM
They should let people continue if they have a pending LC, like you pointed out we're already spent so much money even though its only to apply for LC.
call your Senators and alert them. Write/fax a personal letter asking them to amend the clause to add people who are waiting in line for their LCs for past 5-6 years due to the incompetency of the BECs. I have written a letter and am faxing it to Senators from NY (home state Senators).
call your Senators and alert them. Write/fax a personal letter asking them to amend the clause to add people who are waiting in line for their LCs for past 5-6 years due to the incompetency of the BECs. I have written a letter and am faxing it to Senators from NY (home state Senators).
sweet23guyin
07-30 04:44 PM
Every #/member I call Say's they are supporting the bill and why am I calling to a person who is supporting!
Is this some sort of conspiracy?
Is this some sort of conspiracy?
more...
sheela
08-01 09:36 AM
Today marks the begining of D-day. Best of Luck to all those current per AugVB and let us hope the 'recapture' bill too is passed today to help clear backlogs. Amen!!!
2010 night of quot;Red Dragonquot; in
godspeed
07-08 04:01 PM
Can someone from the donor forum please let us know what the response of the USCIS is to the new MEMO on Unlawful Presence ??
Bhagat69,
Please become a donor to access this information, help IV to help you.
Bhagat69,
Please become a donor to access this information, help IV to help you.
more...
desi3933
08-20 03:12 PM
This is on the clarification page
IRS Clarifies Requirement for Filing FBAR Form Due This Month (http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=209418,00.html)
For this year, taxpayers and others can rely on the definition of a United States person included in the prior instruction: �United States Person The term �United States person� means (1) a citizen or resident of the United States, (2) a domestic partnership, (3) a domestic corporation, or (4) a domestic estate or trust.�
Which category do the H1B holders fall?
>> Which category do the H1B holders fall?
--- Check the bold part ---
The term �United States person� means (1) a citizen or resident of the United States, (2) a domestic partnership, (3) a domestic corporation, or (4) a domestic estate or trust.�
___________________
Not a legal advice.
IRS Clarifies Requirement for Filing FBAR Form Due This Month (http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=209418,00.html)
For this year, taxpayers and others can rely on the definition of a United States person included in the prior instruction: �United States Person The term �United States person� means (1) a citizen or resident of the United States, (2) a domestic partnership, (3) a domestic corporation, or (4) a domestic estate or trust.�
Which category do the H1B holders fall?
>> Which category do the H1B holders fall?
--- Check the bold part ---
The term �United States person� means (1) a citizen or resident of the United States, (2) a domestic partnership, (3) a domestic corporation, or (4) a domestic estate or trust.�
___________________
Not a legal advice.
hair Red Dragon
eb3_nepa
05-01 04:24 PM
IV can even ask some lawyer websites that are sympathetic to our cause to put it on their sites.
Maybe each individual member takes it upon himself/herslef to call abt 10 immigation attorney firms and try and get partnership links. They link to us and we link to them.
Maybe each individual member takes it upon himself/herslef to call abt 10 immigation attorney firms and try and get partnership links. They link to us and we link to them.
more...
jonty_11
06-18 01:32 PM
does teh pasport have to be valid for atleast 6 months at time of filing 485?
hot red-dragon-tattoo
cleopatra
04-28 09:07 PM
It is a good draft overall. Removal of per country cap for EB, non capped GC for STEM masters degree holders, Recapture of lost visas. All of these should help clear the backlog. Also the commission only provides reports to congress every year with recommendations and the congress will vote to increase or decrease the numbers. Also, the spouses and children of LPRs will be considered immediate relatives thus uniting them sooner reducing delay.
Increased border security, biometric social security cards should decrease future flow of illegal immigrants. The two phase approach to those already present in the country illegally will ease them into society slowly and helps to avoid anti-immigrants' stand that this is amnesty for votes. They will not be eligible to vote for at least another 13 years (8 + 5). This is a more humane and better approach to dealing with those already present here.
Overall, this is a good draft that caters to all the current issues of a broken system and should find approval from most except the hard core racists and xenophobes. Let's push to get this enacted soon to make this a reality.
Increased border security, biometric social security cards should decrease future flow of illegal immigrants. The two phase approach to those already present in the country illegally will ease them into society slowly and helps to avoid anti-immigrants' stand that this is amnesty for votes. They will not be eligible to vote for at least another 13 years (8 + 5). This is a more humane and better approach to dealing with those already present here.
Overall, this is a good draft that caters to all the current issues of a broken system and should find approval from most except the hard core racists and xenophobes. Let's push to get this enacted soon to make this a reality.
more...
house dragon tattoos. japanese
ps57002
07-31 02:54 PM
NumbersUSA is in full swing to oppose this bill.. Read their update here:
http://www.numbersusa.com/content/news/july-31-2008/emergency-immigration-subcommittee-votes.html
Look at the lies they are propagating.. these are "new" visas...hmm..
yeah they're at work....let's hope something good happens for us...
http://www.numbersusa.com/content/news/july-31-2008/emergency-immigration-subcommittee-votes.html
Look at the lies they are propagating.. these are "new" visas...hmm..
yeah they're at work....let's hope something good happens for us...
tattoo The Big Red Dragon Tattoo
shx
03-01 11:03 AM
Dear Loudobbs, you are useless fool..trust me..you are useless as well as big fool..you have posted only 104 post. Lot of people are using this forum to convey wrong message and that is creating panic.
The person who started this thread had huge problem and this was his first post..so it is very normal to get the questions and I was the first to respond and it was natural for me to ask that question.
I disagree. Whenever I read your posts, I want to send the exact same response as Loudobbs sent. Now a days, IV is filled with a bunch of losers who are impolite, rude and downright disgusting. It is not posts like 'dimpi's that are a problem for IV. It is people like you, who create a problem, by exposing the so many, so called 'Highly Skilled' immigrants, who can't write one proper sentence in English, or show one good trait of an educated man. The sad part is that they are totally ignorant about their ignorance.
Don't bother to respond. Lets see if you at least follow this.
The person who started this thread had huge problem and this was his first post..so it is very normal to get the questions and I was the first to respond and it was natural for me to ask that question.
I disagree. Whenever I read your posts, I want to send the exact same response as Loudobbs sent. Now a days, IV is filled with a bunch of losers who are impolite, rude and downright disgusting. It is not posts like 'dimpi's that are a problem for IV. It is people like you, who create a problem, by exposing the so many, so called 'Highly Skilled' immigrants, who can't write one proper sentence in English, or show one good trait of an educated man. The sad part is that they are totally ignorant about their ignorance.
Don't bother to respond. Lets see if you at least follow this.
more...
pictures red dragon tattoo
arunsarun
08-22 03:04 PM
In the past 2 months, Even L1s & H1s from top IT companies are getting rejected not sure whats going on....
dresses Ralph Fiennes stars in RED
WeShallOvercome
07-26 01:10 PM
I Don't think that they can return application back, that will be another lawsuit waiting to happen...but i am afraid that they might not process our application until new visa numbers are available again.
Yeah, no one expects them to process applications before visa numbers are available, all we want is acceptance and receipt notices.... they CAN NOT go back on their re-revised bulletin they issued on 17th July.
Yeah, no one expects them to process applications before visa numbers are available, all we want is acceptance and receipt notices.... they CAN NOT go back on their re-revised bulletin they issued on 17th July.
more...
makeup Red Dragon Tattoo Shop
xbohdpukc
09-07 10:37 AM
As I have mentioned before we need to be creative. Lobbying for a law or whatever that gives GC to H1B holders who are on H1B for more than 7 years is the easiest way out because this will not cause much grief - as these people are allready in USA and allready working and paying taxes for 7+ years and giving them GC will not increase the labour pool (which is the main concern for anti immigrant lobbies). Also providing GC to these people will unleash a wave of benefits to the local economy as these new GC holders will now confidently invest in the US economy.
We need somebody who is capable of carrying this message to the heart of the congress and the senators.
This will introduce a new paradigm into the US immigration system - an earned permanent residency. Won't happen any time soon. We can wish a lot, but should be reasonable in what we ask.
We need somebody who is capable of carrying this message to the heart of the congress and the senators.
This will introduce a new paradigm into the US immigration system - an earned permanent residency. Won't happen any time soon. We can wish a lot, but should be reasonable in what we ask.
girlfriend 2010 Dragon tattoos; Dragon
ksarin
04-27 12:58 PM
Guys -
This is my first time posting here. I have been reading different people's experiences about their labor approval.
Here's my story:
Filed for labor in Dec'03 from Wisconsin under EB3. Was approved and sent to Chicago in August 2004. Since then, not a word. Have not yet received the 45 day letter. Is this normal? I am starting to panic a little bit, though I know there is not much I can do in this case.
My attorney is not the pro-active kind. She is just twiddling her thumbs waiting for an answer from USCIS.
Should I call myself and follow up on my case. Can I say this is the attorney calling as opposed to saying this is the alien calling??
Thanks for your response.
This is my first time posting here. I have been reading different people's experiences about their labor approval.
Here's my story:
Filed for labor in Dec'03 from Wisconsin under EB3. Was approved and sent to Chicago in August 2004. Since then, not a word. Have not yet received the 45 day letter. Is this normal? I am starting to panic a little bit, though I know there is not much I can do in this case.
My attorney is not the pro-active kind. She is just twiddling her thumbs waiting for an answer from USCIS.
Should I call myself and follow up on my case. Can I say this is the attorney calling as opposed to saying this is the alien calling??
Thanks for your response.
hairstyles 2011 red dragon tattoos red
krassib
06-07 12:27 PM
dudu,
Yes, by receiveng the letter at least I know that my case was not lost during the trasnfer from SWA to Dallas BEC. My lawer said that DOL told them that they do not have a system in place yet to check the case status. They do not anticipate that they will have a system in place until they are able to issue 45-day letters on all applications, which they anticipate will be by the end of June 2006. Even at that point, we do not know how quickly they will be able to implement a system to provide information on processing times. My lawer also said that they will notify me as soon as they receive any additional correspondence from the Department of Labor regarding my case.
Bottom line my manager still do not have to do anything, becuse he does not have any instructions. Long, long time of waiting ahead ;-(
I hope this helps
Yes, by receiveng the letter at least I know that my case was not lost during the trasnfer from SWA to Dallas BEC. My lawer said that DOL told them that they do not have a system in place yet to check the case status. They do not anticipate that they will have a system in place until they are able to issue 45-day letters on all applications, which they anticipate will be by the end of June 2006. Even at that point, we do not know how quickly they will be able to implement a system to provide information on processing times. My lawer also said that they will notify me as soon as they receive any additional correspondence from the Department of Labor regarding my case.
Bottom line my manager still do not have to do anything, becuse he does not have any instructions. Long, long time of waiting ahead ;-(
I hope this helps
lohaloha
11-10 11:15 AM
Efiled for me and family in July, sent documents over in about a week after e filed. The case status says it is still in initial review! The LUD's were all on 8/21. Our previous AP's expired October 24th. This is incredibly frustrating and stressful. Anybody here has had the same unfortunate experience, please share. Thanks.
Canadian_Dream
05-23 09:13 PM
[QUOTE=Gravitation][LIST]
There's nothing that prevents a law from being retroactive. This has happened in past. Congress decides that, not us. You may find it outrageous, but law is not always intuitive, especially to sb not in the legal profession.
Give me a precedence, preferably Immigration Law.
In this case, the law doesn't even have to active retrogressively to screw us! Why? It's simple, this act says that after it's enacted, it'll force all who didn't file for I-140 to follow new procedure. You follow the new procedure AFTER the law is enacted... so it's not even have to be retroactive! It merely mentions a past cut-off date. Mentioning past cut-off dates is nothing new in law-making.
Retrogression was always a law. We only got caught in it. Retrogression has happened in the past (1997-98). Its affects are severe and noticeable this time because of large number of H1B filers from India past year 2000.
There's nothing that prevents a law from being retroactive. This has happened in past. Congress decides that, not us. You may find it outrageous, but law is not always intuitive, especially to sb not in the legal profession.
Give me a precedence, preferably Immigration Law.
In this case, the law doesn't even have to active retrogressively to screw us! Why? It's simple, this act says that after it's enacted, it'll force all who didn't file for I-140 to follow new procedure. You follow the new procedure AFTER the law is enacted... so it's not even have to be retroactive! It merely mentions a past cut-off date. Mentioning past cut-off dates is nothing new in law-making.
Retrogression was always a law. We only got caught in it. Retrogression has happened in the past (1997-98). Its affects are severe and noticeable this time because of large number of H1B filers from India past year 2000.
No comments:
Post a Comment