xyz2005
08-01 06:47 PM
Our Pd is Oct 2005 - EB2 - NSC Center - July filer
Our EAD got renewed and AP is still pending.
One Doubt i have is there was a LUD on 7/27/2008 on our last year AP, this is been approved long back what does this mean?. However no LUD on 485.
had LUD on last yrs AP and nothing on new and no LUD on 485 ever since it has been filed
Thanks
Our EAD got renewed and AP is still pending.
One Doubt i have is there was a LUD on 7/27/2008 on our last year AP, this is been approved long back what does this mean?. However no LUD on 485.
had LUD on last yrs AP and nothing on new and no LUD on 485 ever since it has been filed
Thanks
wallpaper Ray Charles Quote
thomachan72
04-02 04:03 PM
So what you are saying is that kids (<21 or >21 years) who are in I-485 status can go to college with the same status....work with institutions if they have any issues .. financial sorta.. but should not be having any legal status issues. understand.
But what is this aged out issue we are talking about here??? I do not understand...any pointers... I am sorry...I do not know full details for this criteria.
Hallo Openarms,
I dont know whether this would be of any better information that you already know but here is my little explanation.
Let us say a kid becomes a beneficiary of a EB green card application at age 14, with a priority date of 2002. The issue arises when the processing takes a long time and during that period the kid exceeds the 21 year age limit (becomes aged out) and therefore can no longer be considered under the same application, even if it is approved. So at 21 years the kid is already going to college in the US and suddenly finds himself/herself out of status. He/she has to convert to an F1/H1b visa to stay in the country and start the green card process all over again by themselves. Because they no longer fall under their parents application.
Now if you look at the priority date of EB3 India it is 2001 and so many of the kids are highly likely to experience this problem, particularly due to increased RFEs or what not delays. For people with EB3 application and PD of 2002/2003, who knows when their chance will come and unfortunately many have kids who are in the narrow age limit.
What we need is either:-
1) Take off completely the clause of "aged out" it is stupid and ridiculous and completely irrational.
2) or Include legal kids who have spent a minimum of 5 years in the US with all the bla bla bla criteria setforth for the ilegal kids, into the Dream Act.
otherwise these kids are really screwed and they need our help.
But what is this aged out issue we are talking about here??? I do not understand...any pointers... I am sorry...I do not know full details for this criteria.
Hallo Openarms,
I dont know whether this would be of any better information that you already know but here is my little explanation.
Let us say a kid becomes a beneficiary of a EB green card application at age 14, with a priority date of 2002. The issue arises when the processing takes a long time and during that period the kid exceeds the 21 year age limit (becomes aged out) and therefore can no longer be considered under the same application, even if it is approved. So at 21 years the kid is already going to college in the US and suddenly finds himself/herself out of status. He/she has to convert to an F1/H1b visa to stay in the country and start the green card process all over again by themselves. Because they no longer fall under their parents application.
Now if you look at the priority date of EB3 India it is 2001 and so many of the kids are highly likely to experience this problem, particularly due to increased RFEs or what not delays. For people with EB3 application and PD of 2002/2003, who knows when their chance will come and unfortunately many have kids who are in the narrow age limit.
What we need is either:-
1) Take off completely the clause of "aged out" it is stupid and ridiculous and completely irrational.
2) or Include legal kids who have spent a minimum of 5 years in the US with all the bla bla bla criteria setforth for the ilegal kids, into the Dream Act.
otherwise these kids are really screwed and they need our help.
pappu
09-11 02:29 PM
follow this link to clear any doubts
http://www.immigrationportal.com/showthread.php?p=1508840#post1508840
Where and How did you get this data? I would be interested in it for further analysis.
http://www.immigrationportal.com/showthread.php?p=1508840#post1508840
Where and How did you get this data? I would be interested in it for further analysis.
2011 Music is what feelings sound
dtekkedil
07-04 04:23 PM
We all need to send flowers on the same day such that it reaches at the same time..like a sea of flowers sitting outside USCIS. The idea is to get noticed by the media and not to get sympathy from USCIS.
People have already started sending flowers with a delivery date of July 10th!
Check out the previous pages you will find links to florists, the address, the message etc.
There is no coordination necessary for now.. just schedule the delivery for July 10th.
People have already started sending flowers with a delivery date of July 10th!
Check out the previous pages you will find links to florists, the address, the message etc.
There is no coordination necessary for now.. just schedule the delivery for July 10th.
more...
Munna Bhai
12-10 12:53 PM
how can even you question company when the applicant has already ported under AC21 and switched employers. From that time, the new employer is responsible for paying proffered wages and thats what document they ask for when issuing AC21 RFE.
si i disagree that cmpany is responsible for showing capability until candidate gets GC. It is until candidate gets GC or switched employers under AC21, whichever comes first.
What you said is true but do remember USCIS can visit any case any time and I-140 can be revoked due to fraud,mis-representation etc and they can take these issues for fighting with you. Read unitednations inputs in this forum.
You have strong case if you are ready to fight but until you get all the documents from your original GC company you may have difficult time to prove it.
si i disagree that cmpany is responsible for showing capability until candidate gets GC. It is until candidate gets GC or switched employers under AC21, whichever comes first.
What you said is true but do remember USCIS can visit any case any time and I-140 can be revoked due to fraud,mis-representation etc and they can take these issues for fighting with you. Read unitednations inputs in this forum.
You have strong case if you are ready to fight but until you get all the documents from your original GC company you may have difficult time to prove it.
msp1976
05-19 01:39 PM
Folks -
What is the form ETA 750B?
I filed for my labor in Dec'03 from Wisconsin under EB3. In dec 05 my attorney sent me the form 750B asking for my signature. That is 2 years later. Is this the form the attorney should have submitted when initially filing the labor certification?
I am still awaiting my 45 day letter.
Dat is not good...Do you have any proof that they filed for you in Dec'03???
Otherwise it is possible that they scr*** you royally.....Most likely your PD is dec 05 now. It happned to me also I asked my company for file for me...They kept telling me that they have filed for 1.5 years...One fine day they told me that the DOL can no longer find my application.......Lawyer said she submitted the application and she dunno what happened...
Looks like your case is just like mine....
Your PD is Dec 05 now...unless you have some proof of the 2003 filing.....
What is the form ETA 750B?
I filed for my labor in Dec'03 from Wisconsin under EB3. In dec 05 my attorney sent me the form 750B asking for my signature. That is 2 years later. Is this the form the attorney should have submitted when initially filing the labor certification?
I am still awaiting my 45 day letter.
Dat is not good...Do you have any proof that they filed for you in Dec'03???
Otherwise it is possible that they scr*** you royally.....Most likely your PD is dec 05 now. It happned to me also I asked my company for file for me...They kept telling me that they have filed for 1.5 years...One fine day they told me that the DOL can no longer find my application.......Lawyer said she submitted the application and she dunno what happened...
Looks like your case is just like mine....
Your PD is Dec 05 now...unless you have some proof of the 2003 filing.....
more...
broadcaster
11-26 10:08 AM
According to my Attorney, there is a liasson for each service center. I am copying information diplayed in the AILA's website. These are the rules for Texas, but I am sure that your Attorney can explain you this process.
The "Rules" for Requesting Liaison Assistance
The following are the "rules" for when a request for assistance from the TSC liaison committee would be considered appropriate:
1. Out of respect for the time and effort being generously donated by the liaison committee members, this benefit is only available to AILA members. USCIS reminds us that the member whose name is on the G-28 must make the request, not another attorney in the office. Requests for assistance made by legal assistants or non-AILA members of the firm will not be recognized, acted upon, or replied to. Under no circumstances should you have your client call, fax or e-mail a liaison committee member or the National Office.
2. Before requesting Liaison assistance, a member should first contact a USCIS Customer Service Representative at (800) 375-5283 between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 6:00 P.M. (any Continental U.S. time zone) Monday through Friday.
3. If the time has passed that the Customer Service Representative indicated it would take to receive a response, and no meaningful response has been received, complete and send the web-based automated AILA/TSC liaison form.
4. Items appropriate for liaison assistance include cases that are significantly outside the most recently published adjudication times for the TSC for that type of matter (note that this refers to the TSC Processing Time Report, not the processing time stated on the receipt notice), USCIS errors on the receipt or approval notice, or clear misstatements of law in a Request for Evidence ("RFE") or decision. Liaison is not the appropriate mechanism for submitting expedite requests other than age-outs, addressing RFEs or decisions that are disputable on the law, fact or evidence, cases within the most recently published time guidelines, or corrections of notices for which the error was on the part of the attorney, petitioner or applicant. That being said, issues regarding clear misstatement of law or policy in an RFE or decision or issues of vague or inappropriate RFEs may be appropriate. Requests involving such matters should specify what the misstatement is, what the correct law/policy is, and provide a photocopy of the RFE or decision and correct law or policy recitation along with a completed Inquiry Form.
5. If the request is appropriate for liaison assistance, the National Office will forward it on to the Liaison committee member assigned to deal with that particular area. The Liaison committee member will then contact an appropriate person within the Service Center.
6. The Committee, together with the Center Director, Assistant Center Directors (ACDs), and line managers as appropriate to given issues, will meet on a regular basis to discuss and resolve policy issues and matters of mutual concern. Your requests for inclusion of agenda items are always welcome, and should first be sent to the AILA National Office at tscliaison@aila.org.
7. It is impossible to give a firm schedule as to when you can expect a reply to your problem cases. Much depends upon the nature of the problem and where the file is located. We have been assured by the Center, that every effort will be made to resolve these cases on a timely basis. Each ACD and Liaison will work out a mutually agreeable schedule for contacts, but by using e-mail, the process should speed up for all concerned.
8. Due to the massive volume of requests, it is not possible for Liaison committee members to have telephone conversations with every AILA member who has an inquiry. Please do not phone the Liaison to follow up with an inquiry that was e-mailed to the National Office. However, if you sent a TSC liaison request to the National Office, and have not received a notice acknowledging your request from the National Office within one week, please re-submit the request as it may have been lost in transit. Each Liaison member will endeavor to contact you when a request has been made on your behalf. In many instances you may hear from the TSC directly. When a Liaison receives a response from USCIS on your inquiry then you will receive an e-mail with an update. Expect an average of three weeks for a response. Should a detailed explanation be necessary, the Liaison committee member will take the initiative to contact you.
9. Members are asked to keep in mind that all liaison representatives are volunteers, contributing their time, effort and financial resources to the liaison program. Although there is never any place for abusive behavior toward one's colleagues, this is particularly true when seeking and/or receiving liaison services.
10. If you have submitted an inquiry and received a response saying your case remains pending due to security checks, please do not file another inquiry until 6 months have passed from the date of the response. There is nothing the TSC can do about delays caused by security checks.
The "Rules" for Requesting Liaison Assistance
The following are the "rules" for when a request for assistance from the TSC liaison committee would be considered appropriate:
1. Out of respect for the time and effort being generously donated by the liaison committee members, this benefit is only available to AILA members. USCIS reminds us that the member whose name is on the G-28 must make the request, not another attorney in the office. Requests for assistance made by legal assistants or non-AILA members of the firm will not be recognized, acted upon, or replied to. Under no circumstances should you have your client call, fax or e-mail a liaison committee member or the National Office.
2. Before requesting Liaison assistance, a member should first contact a USCIS Customer Service Representative at (800) 375-5283 between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 6:00 P.M. (any Continental U.S. time zone) Monday through Friday.
3. If the time has passed that the Customer Service Representative indicated it would take to receive a response, and no meaningful response has been received, complete and send the web-based automated AILA/TSC liaison form.
4. Items appropriate for liaison assistance include cases that are significantly outside the most recently published adjudication times for the TSC for that type of matter (note that this refers to the TSC Processing Time Report, not the processing time stated on the receipt notice), USCIS errors on the receipt or approval notice, or clear misstatements of law in a Request for Evidence ("RFE") or decision. Liaison is not the appropriate mechanism for submitting expedite requests other than age-outs, addressing RFEs or decisions that are disputable on the law, fact or evidence, cases within the most recently published time guidelines, or corrections of notices for which the error was on the part of the attorney, petitioner or applicant. That being said, issues regarding clear misstatement of law or policy in an RFE or decision or issues of vague or inappropriate RFEs may be appropriate. Requests involving such matters should specify what the misstatement is, what the correct law/policy is, and provide a photocopy of the RFE or decision and correct law or policy recitation along with a completed Inquiry Form.
5. If the request is appropriate for liaison assistance, the National Office will forward it on to the Liaison committee member assigned to deal with that particular area. The Liaison committee member will then contact an appropriate person within the Service Center.
6. The Committee, together with the Center Director, Assistant Center Directors (ACDs), and line managers as appropriate to given issues, will meet on a regular basis to discuss and resolve policy issues and matters of mutual concern. Your requests for inclusion of agenda items are always welcome, and should first be sent to the AILA National Office at tscliaison@aila.org.
7. It is impossible to give a firm schedule as to when you can expect a reply to your problem cases. Much depends upon the nature of the problem and where the file is located. We have been assured by the Center, that every effort will be made to resolve these cases on a timely basis. Each ACD and Liaison will work out a mutually agreeable schedule for contacts, but by using e-mail, the process should speed up for all concerned.
8. Due to the massive volume of requests, it is not possible for Liaison committee members to have telephone conversations with every AILA member who has an inquiry. Please do not phone the Liaison to follow up with an inquiry that was e-mailed to the National Office. However, if you sent a TSC liaison request to the National Office, and have not received a notice acknowledging your request from the National Office within one week, please re-submit the request as it may have been lost in transit. Each Liaison member will endeavor to contact you when a request has been made on your behalf. In many instances you may hear from the TSC directly. When a Liaison receives a response from USCIS on your inquiry then you will receive an e-mail with an update. Expect an average of three weeks for a response. Should a detailed explanation be necessary, the Liaison committee member will take the initiative to contact you.
9. Members are asked to keep in mind that all liaison representatives are volunteers, contributing their time, effort and financial resources to the liaison program. Although there is never any place for abusive behavior toward one's colleagues, this is particularly true when seeking and/or receiving liaison services.
10. If you have submitted an inquiry and received a response saying your case remains pending due to security checks, please do not file another inquiry until 6 months have passed from the date of the response. There is nothing the TSC can do about delays caused by security checks.
2010 hair funny music quotes. music
cvt123
09-20 04:54 PM
Yes it is, if you have been in these forums for months. Your very first post looks very negative. Please try to put all your energy in positive way and encourage others.
But if this is to raise funds. I better make a pledge and hold the check for now. When is asking clarification become negative in your world?
But if this is to raise funds. I better make a pledge and hold the check for now. When is asking clarification become negative in your world?
more...
drirshad
09-20 11:31 PM
So r IV members, bravo ................. :)
hair music is life quotes. quotes
jonty_11
07-26 04:05 PM
if anyone paid attention to my post...
EVERY USCIS CSR/ Immi Officer will give u a different story....
Those that are nice n polite will comfort u..
Those that follow numbersusa and their ilk will try to put u down/discourage u...
Remember USCIS folks are people like u and me....they have their opinions too which may cloud their views................
So just relax and let time take its course.....
EVERY USCIS CSR/ Immi Officer will give u a different story....
Those that are nice n polite will comfort u..
Those that follow numbersusa and their ilk will try to put u down/discourage u...
Remember USCIS folks are people like u and me....they have their opinions too which may cloud their views................
So just relax and let time take its course.....
more...
dilbert_cal
04-27 12:47 PM
All, Thank you guys (IneedAllGreen, jfredr, vikki76, werc, dan19, kumar_77) to each one of you.
.
:eek: Where is Dilbert ;) Just kidding buddy :D
Best of luck
.
:eek: Where is Dilbert ;) Just kidding buddy :D
Best of luck
hot music quotes
spendemMD
04-25 06:19 PM
PD :Oct 2004
Approval :April 2006
Dallas BRC
Approval :April 2006
Dallas BRC
more...
house love music quotes. i love
svr_76
08-06 01:34 PM
I have just written the following to my local congressman to look into this. Maybe you should also do this.
-----------------------
I am writing to you about a recent concern that I read about in the news report about a border security boost bill that has passed in the Senate and now headed for the Congress. AFP: US Senate passes border security boost (http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hpS6ZKo4wAryQNsBY9i7PxjF3F7g)
Specifically I have serious concerns about the levy it applies to the H1B visa application to support border security.
1. For one this is arbitary in charging legal immigrants to support a task which does not benefit them directly.
2. This is a step back which would drasically affect competitiveness of companies in the US to hire in US and provide services to US companies which create more jobs.
3. While it is important to punish people who circumvent the intent of the law, it is capricious to charge and do something completely different with the money that does not solve the visa exploitation issue (in this case spending on border security). This ends up being an unnecessary burden.
I would be greatly appreciate it if you can look into this.
Thanks,
Gaurav
@Gaurav
1. Legal Immigrants are not being charged. Their employers (who could be American or Foreign Corporations are being chared). If immigrants are paying for this fee then its illegal act by the employer.
2. With the increased fee and more stringent followup on how employer "proove" that they have done their due-deligence to hire locals...is a way the current govt is looking to stem the job loss figure and also have employer pick up graduates from technical college (read young citizen returning from active duty and taking up education to renter the mainstream.) Their education was sponsered by the govt and so its their way to ensure that these folks are not side-tracked...
3. How the revenue get's utilized or is put of use cannot be argued. Eg. The top income tax payer will use similar argument and say build more "fast racing" tracks/road for us to use instead of fixing ailing roads in remote places etc bcos we are paying the bulk of money.
-----------------------
I am writing to you about a recent concern that I read about in the news report about a border security boost bill that has passed in the Senate and now headed for the Congress. AFP: US Senate passes border security boost (http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hpS6ZKo4wAryQNsBY9i7PxjF3F7g)
Specifically I have serious concerns about the levy it applies to the H1B visa application to support border security.
1. For one this is arbitary in charging legal immigrants to support a task which does not benefit them directly.
2. This is a step back which would drasically affect competitiveness of companies in the US to hire in US and provide services to US companies which create more jobs.
3. While it is important to punish people who circumvent the intent of the law, it is capricious to charge and do something completely different with the money that does not solve the visa exploitation issue (in this case spending on border security). This ends up being an unnecessary burden.
I would be greatly appreciate it if you can look into this.
Thanks,
Gaurav
@Gaurav
1. Legal Immigrants are not being charged. Their employers (who could be American or Foreign Corporations are being chared). If immigrants are paying for this fee then its illegal act by the employer.
2. With the increased fee and more stringent followup on how employer "proove" that they have done their due-deligence to hire locals...is a way the current govt is looking to stem the job loss figure and also have employer pick up graduates from technical college (read young citizen returning from active duty and taking up education to renter the mainstream.) Their education was sponsered by the govt and so its their way to ensure that these folks are not side-tracked...
3. How the revenue get's utilized or is put of use cannot be argued. Eg. The top income tax payer will use similar argument and say build more "fast racing" tracks/road for us to use instead of fixing ailing roads in remote places etc bcos we are paying the bulk of money.
tattoo music, music quote, music
pappu
08-16 09:07 AM
another org to contact
http://www.iarcnational.org/index.php?content=Advocacy
They have immigration in their agenda
Ensuring a fair legal immigration system
The United States was founded as a nation of immigrants. With the Statue of Liberty standing as a symbol of America’s commitment to immigration, America has embraced newcomers from India and other nations into a welcoming society in which we all have a place. While tighter controls on illegal immigration are absolutely necessary, the IARC is committed to ensuring that the well-established legal immigration system remains intact. Specifically, the IARC supports:
*
Maintaining the family and employment-based immigration categories
*
Clearing the immigration-waiting list backlogs, particularly for family-based reunification
*
Maintaining the H-1B visa program
*
Speeding up the processing of naturalization paperwork
*
Revising procedures at U.S. consulates overseas to ensure that visitor and student visas are issued in a fair and predictable manner
*
Ensuring that the recently instituted national non-immigrant registration program is administered fairly
==============
and another one
http://www.ialipac.org/services.php
==============
http://www.iarcnational.org/index.php?content=Advocacy
They have immigration in their agenda
Ensuring a fair legal immigration system
The United States was founded as a nation of immigrants. With the Statue of Liberty standing as a symbol of America’s commitment to immigration, America has embraced newcomers from India and other nations into a welcoming society in which we all have a place. While tighter controls on illegal immigration are absolutely necessary, the IARC is committed to ensuring that the well-established legal immigration system remains intact. Specifically, the IARC supports:
*
Maintaining the family and employment-based immigration categories
*
Clearing the immigration-waiting list backlogs, particularly for family-based reunification
*
Maintaining the H-1B visa program
*
Speeding up the processing of naturalization paperwork
*
Revising procedures at U.S. consulates overseas to ensure that visitor and student visas are issued in a fair and predictable manner
*
Ensuring that the recently instituted national non-immigrant registration program is administered fairly
==============
and another one
http://www.ialipac.org/services.php
==============
more...
pictures Facts and quotes about music
shukla77
12-05 07:44 PM
Even though I am not a core member and not very active in the forums, time to time I do visit the site. It is really amazing to see how much efforts IV core team is putting for this cause.My question to all the people who constantly complain about the update is that how many times all these people have done something significant for the cause (Getting involved with state chapters, meeting with law makers, traveling to different places, organizing interviews, get the media coverage).It is not a shop where you go pay 100-200$ and ask for updates immediately...
For people who dont like my reply... I dont care
-----------------------------------------------
For IV core team - Great Job:)
-----------------------------------------------
For people who dont like my reply... I dont care
-----------------------------------------------
For IV core team - Great Job:)
-----------------------------------------------
dresses quotes about music and
patiently_waiting
09-27 03:22 PM
thanks
more...
makeup Tags: music quotes
ArunAntonio
06-13 07:02 PM
Here is a list of things you need to get together.
Good Luck and wish me luck as well.
- AA
Completed I-485 form for Primary applicant and spouse
Medical Examination Results for both Principal applicant and spouse --
eight (8) photographs taken in accordance with the USCIS specifications for both Principal applicant and spouse
Copy of each family member’s current Visa stamp and I-94 departure record card
Long form birth certificate of Principal applicant and all dependents (Spouse, kids, pets like dogs, cats etc )
Marriage certificate
Copy of each family member’s passport, current and cancelled including blank pages.
Copy of each EAD cards if any of all the applicants
Copy of I-20’s if any of all applicants
Copy of all I-797 approval notices if any of all applicants
Copy of US Drivers license of all applicants
Copy of SSN cards of both Principal applicant and spouse
--------------------
Copy of Divorce decree if applicable
Copy of reocrds of any legal convictions etc.
For medical exam make an appointment using this link:
http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=eb1f3591ec04d010VgnVCM10000048f3d6a1RCR D&vgnextchannel=db029c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1 RCRD
Marriage Certificate:
If you dont have a marriage certificate from the proper municipal authority.
Two affidavits of marriage from one parent each of principal and spouse in lieu of Marriage certificate
Birth Certificate:
If you dont have a long form birth certificate
- Non Availibility certificate from the local municipal authority stating that the Birth record could not be found in the registers,
Two affidavits from either your parents or relatives who were present at the birth. Make sure you research on the correct format for the affidavits
If you have a long form birth certificate which was issued recently
Then you still need Two affidavits from either your parents or relatives who were present at the birth along with the Long form birth certificate
"Affidavit would apply to your case only if you are unable to provide a long version of your birth certificate which is a document that was issued at the time of birth and lists your full name as well as the full names of each parent. If a long form birth certificate does not exist, then a letter from the municipality of your home country is required to state whether a record or birth does or does not exist. In addition to the letter from the municipality two affidavits of birth according to the format offered below would be required."
Most aliens who have pending applications for immigration benefits or for changes in nonimmigrant status need Advance Parole to re-enter the U.S. after traveling abroad. Aliens applying for advance parole on the basis of a pending application for adjustment of status must be approved for advance parole prior to leaving the United States in order to avoid the termination of their pending application for adjustment. Note: this does not apply to aliens who have applied to adjust to permanent resident status and who maintain H-1B (Specialty Worker) or L-1 (Intracompany Transferee) status, or their dependents, who have applied to adjust to permanent resident status and who have valid H-1B or L status and valid visas. Please note that the USCIS normally requires that the applicants for adjustment of status traveling on H or L visas carry with them the receipt for filing Form I-485. It usually takes no longer than four weeks to receive a receipt for filing Form I-485 from the USCIS.
Good Luck and wish me luck as well.
- AA
Completed I-485 form for Primary applicant and spouse
Medical Examination Results for both Principal applicant and spouse --
eight (8) photographs taken in accordance with the USCIS specifications for both Principal applicant and spouse
Copy of each family member’s current Visa stamp and I-94 departure record card
Long form birth certificate of Principal applicant and all dependents (Spouse, kids, pets like dogs, cats etc )
Marriage certificate
Copy of each family member’s passport, current and cancelled including blank pages.
Copy of each EAD cards if any of all the applicants
Copy of I-20’s if any of all applicants
Copy of all I-797 approval notices if any of all applicants
Copy of US Drivers license of all applicants
Copy of SSN cards of both Principal applicant and spouse
--------------------
Copy of Divorce decree if applicable
Copy of reocrds of any legal convictions etc.
For medical exam make an appointment using this link:
http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=eb1f3591ec04d010VgnVCM10000048f3d6a1RCR D&vgnextchannel=db029c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1 RCRD
Marriage Certificate:
If you dont have a marriage certificate from the proper municipal authority.
Two affidavits of marriage from one parent each of principal and spouse in lieu of Marriage certificate
Birth Certificate:
If you dont have a long form birth certificate
- Non Availibility certificate from the local municipal authority stating that the Birth record could not be found in the registers,
Two affidavits from either your parents or relatives who were present at the birth. Make sure you research on the correct format for the affidavits
If you have a long form birth certificate which was issued recently
Then you still need Two affidavits from either your parents or relatives who were present at the birth along with the Long form birth certificate
"Affidavit would apply to your case only if you are unable to provide a long version of your birth certificate which is a document that was issued at the time of birth and lists your full name as well as the full names of each parent. If a long form birth certificate does not exist, then a letter from the municipality of your home country is required to state whether a record or birth does or does not exist. In addition to the letter from the municipality two affidavits of birth according to the format offered below would be required."
Most aliens who have pending applications for immigration benefits or for changes in nonimmigrant status need Advance Parole to re-enter the U.S. after traveling abroad. Aliens applying for advance parole on the basis of a pending application for adjustment of status must be approved for advance parole prior to leaving the United States in order to avoid the termination of their pending application for adjustment. Note: this does not apply to aliens who have applied to adjust to permanent resident status and who maintain H-1B (Specialty Worker) or L-1 (Intracompany Transferee) status, or their dependents, who have applied to adjust to permanent resident status and who have valid H-1B or L status and valid visas. Please note that the USCIS normally requires that the applicants for adjustment of status traveling on H or L visas carry with them the receipt for filing Form I-485. It usually takes no longer than four weeks to receive a receipt for filing Form I-485 from the USCIS.
girlfriend quotes on music. quotes
unitednations
12-27 11:47 PM
This is, indeed, very interesting. Here is the link to the court ruling:
http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov:8080/isysnative/RDpcT3BpbnNcT1BOXDAzLTYxMzlfb3BuLnBkZg==/03-6139_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov:8080/isysquery/irl208b/1/hilite
"Under the plain language of Section 1155, a decision by the INS to revoke its approval of a visa petition shall not �have effect� unless (1) the alien receives notice of the revocation from the Secretary of State (2) before departing for the United States. In this case, it is undisputed that Chai did not receive notice of revocation�from the Secretary of State or any other party�before
departing for the United States; he was already in the United States when the INS revoked its approval of his immigrant visa petition. Indeed, Chai was already in the United States on a nonimmigrant visa when his immigrant visa petition was initially approved. Therefore, under the terms of Section 1155, the revocation of his petition was not effective."
I'm not sure if this is the same case but there was a case that happened in 2004 where uscis revoked an 140 petition. The attorney used the INA to state that once a person commences journey to usa then the 140 cannot be revoked. This had been tried many times unsuccessfully. However; in this case the attorney was successful.
Guess what; four months later the law was changed to allow them to revoke petitions. Since they changed the law; the 140 was ultimately revoked.
This was a hot topic in 2004 and 2005.
http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov:8080/isysnative/RDpcT3BpbnNcT1BOXDAzLTYxMzlfb3BuLnBkZg==/03-6139_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov:8080/isysquery/irl208b/1/hilite
"Under the plain language of Section 1155, a decision by the INS to revoke its approval of a visa petition shall not �have effect� unless (1) the alien receives notice of the revocation from the Secretary of State (2) before departing for the United States. In this case, it is undisputed that Chai did not receive notice of revocation�from the Secretary of State or any other party�before
departing for the United States; he was already in the United States when the INS revoked its approval of his immigrant visa petition. Indeed, Chai was already in the United States on a nonimmigrant visa when his immigrant visa petition was initially approved. Therefore, under the terms of Section 1155, the revocation of his petition was not effective."
I'm not sure if this is the same case but there was a case that happened in 2004 where uscis revoked an 140 petition. The attorney used the INA to state that once a person commences journey to usa then the 140 cannot be revoked. This had been tried many times unsuccessfully. However; in this case the attorney was successful.
Guess what; four months later the law was changed to allow them to revoke petitions. Since they changed the law; the 140 was ultimately revoked.
This was a hot topic in 2004 and 2005.
hairstyles cute quotes about music. cute
snathan
02-24 03:21 PM
Its clear there are many who are frustrated. I feel there is a better way to convince people to contribute. I have been registered with this site for several years now. I hardly know much about this organization. sure there is a nice little bio on here of core members but what role do they play on a daily basis? is this organization a democracy where people get elected to posts every year or do the people running it pledge to run it forever? why is information hidden from non-donors? Where can i find site admins...do i have to search forum posts or is there some place that lists them? what are the goals for advocacy? who decides? is there a vote?
i can go on with a list of serious concerns about IV
once people are convinced of a well run organization and see where exactly their money or time will be spent then i am sure there will be many more contributions made.
First you will have to understand IV is run by volunteers who has a full time job and family to take care. More most of the IV core people are alreay GC holders and no one is getting paid for their time and effort. The only goal is to fix the back log.
We can not make everything public as there are so many vested interest and will harm our efforts. We do not have enough support, resource to declare a open war like undocumented people. So we will have to keep thing under wraps. If you want to tak part, there are various groups working on various fix. Join one those group, spend time and you will understand and appreciate what the volunteers are doing.
Thanks,
i can go on with a list of serious concerns about IV
once people are convinced of a well run organization and see where exactly their money or time will be spent then i am sure there will be many more contributions made.
First you will have to understand IV is run by volunteers who has a full time job and family to take care. More most of the IV core people are alreay GC holders and no one is getting paid for their time and effort. The only goal is to fix the back log.
We can not make everything public as there are so many vested interest and will harm our efforts. We do not have enough support, resource to declare a open war like undocumented people. So we will have to keep thing under wraps. If you want to tak part, there are various groups working on various fix. Join one those group, spend time and you will understand and appreciate what the volunteers are doing.
Thanks,
nissan_1
07-15 10:54 PM
I am EB3 India and I think the root cause of EB3 India backlog in too many applicants in EB3 India category. And the main reason for this is most of H1B visa holders are Indian. It is unfair that USCIS does not set a country limit on H1B but limits while granting GC. Now we can write as many letters or campaign about removing per country limit for GC, but I think no one is going to listen. Most of my Indian friends who got green cards/citizens do not care about our backlog/issues. Very soon our EB2 friends will be current and they will also stop caring for so called "broken immigration system". And media/american people/companies does not care about EB3 people's sufferings. But most of these people do read evey news regarding H1B. Hence I have a different idea of getting attention (please excuse me if this idea was talked previously).
- Do a campagain/Rally to impose a per country limit on H1B. We will demand only 7000 Indian H1B per year. At least the "lucky" future EB3 Indians will not face back log. I know lot of Future H1B applicants from India will not like it. But this is for their own good. They are better off not comming here and face immigration discrimination.
- I really want to see how companies get 65000 TALENTS from ROW. If the companies/govt push for no country limit on H1B, they have to justify why they need country limit while giving GC.
- If companies manages to get 65000 H1Bs from ROW, then the backlog will be on ROW.
- I hope this will gain media attention as the head lines in the news channel will say "Indian H1B techies are in the street to STOP more Indian H1Bs". And then we will tell our reasons.
- Do a campagain/Rally to impose a per country limit on H1B. We will demand only 7000 Indian H1B per year. At least the "lucky" future EB3 Indians will not face back log. I know lot of Future H1B applicants from India will not like it. But this is for their own good. They are better off not comming here and face immigration discrimination.
- I really want to see how companies get 65000 TALENTS from ROW. If the companies/govt push for no country limit on H1B, they have to justify why they need country limit while giving GC.
- If companies manages to get 65000 H1Bs from ROW, then the backlog will be on ROW.
- I hope this will gain media attention as the head lines in the news channel will say "Indian H1B techies are in the street to STOP more Indian H1Bs". And then we will tell our reasons.
crsna
10-26 04:39 PM
I'm pretty sure you have touched the raw nerve of many. If you really want a person of your own culture, to care for your child legally you should consider the Au Pair program http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Au_pair . This may or may not be applicable to the person you want to bring in as a maid.
No comments:
Post a Comment