yabadaba
11-17 02:58 PM
as per http://www.immigration-law.com/
11/17/2006: SHOCKS! The House Will Stay Adjourned From 11/20/06 (Monday) thru 12/04/2006!!
It is shocking that the House will go into a dormant stage beginning from November 20, next Monday, through December 04, 2006, Monday, and there will be no floor session until December 5, 2006, Tuesday. We thought they would spend busy days next two or three weeks.
************************************************** ****
aj
i dont see it anywhere on the news/blogs/ roll call?
matthew oh is famous for ridiculous headline type one line posts... dont know if this one of them
***** looked around*****
ok in lame duck session i ll eat crow:
http://majoritywhip.house.gov/whipnotice.asp?date=11/20/2006
looks like hes right after all
11/17/2006: SHOCKS! The House Will Stay Adjourned From 11/20/06 (Monday) thru 12/04/2006!!
It is shocking that the House will go into a dormant stage beginning from November 20, next Monday, through December 04, 2006, Monday, and there will be no floor session until December 5, 2006, Tuesday. We thought they would spend busy days next two or three weeks.
************************************************** ****
aj
i dont see it anywhere on the news/blogs/ roll call?
matthew oh is famous for ridiculous headline type one line posts... dont know if this one of them
***** looked around*****
ok in lame duck session i ll eat crow:
http://majoritywhip.house.gov/whipnotice.asp?date=11/20/2006
looks like hes right after all
wallpaper Cannabis Wallpaper
for_gc
05-23 03:29 PM
Also, from the same section posted by GCard_Dream
Aliens with
30 applications for a labor certification pursuant to section
31 212(a)(5)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act shall
32 preserve the immigrant visa priority date accorded by the date
33 of filing of such labor certification application.
34
35 (
This means that even if your LC is not approved. You will be able to preserve your PD which in this case will be the date of filing of your LC. This seems good also for people whose Labour is still stuck in the BEC's.
Aliens with
30 applications for a labor certification pursuant to section
31 212(a)(5)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act shall
32 preserve the immigrant visa priority date accorded by the date
33 of filing of such labor certification application.
34
35 (
This means that even if your LC is not approved. You will be able to preserve your PD which in this case will be the date of filing of your LC. This seems good also for people whose Labour is still stuck in the BEC's.
sdrblr
07-02 03:59 PM
OK Looks like it is balance which should exceed 10K at given time in a year and not sum of the transactions one has made in a year.
I will post more once I hear from my CPA.
I also have the same question(s)
1) Is it ?$10K at any time or aggregate for the year.
2) since my citi NRI does not pay any interest, I dont have to declare it.
Does this mean no FBAR for me. I have sent an email to my CPA and waitingggggggg !!!! :)
I will post more once I hear from my CPA.
I also have the same question(s)
1) Is it ?$10K at any time or aggregate for the year.
2) since my citi NRI does not pay any interest, I dont have to declare it.
Does this mean no FBAR for me. I have sent an email to my CPA and waitingggggggg !!!! :)
2011 stock vector : green cannabis
msyedy
12-03 11:21 PM
GOOD GCSOON,
Specter, Will he change our lives, I dont think so. Taking CIR is impossible.
You have not read any comments in this section, I believe you read them and the links provided.. You would know the future of CIR.
Hope for EB, CIR is impossible.
ADIOS
Specter, Will he change our lives, I dont think so. Taking CIR is impossible.
You have not read any comments in this section, I believe you read them and the links provided.. You would know the future of CIR.
Hope for EB, CIR is impossible.
ADIOS
more...
harivenkat
04-29 08:03 PM
Democrats Outline Plans for Immigration Changes - NYTimes.com (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/30/us/politics/30immig.html)
Democrats Outline Plans for Immigration Changes
By CARL HULSE and DAVID M. HERSZENHORN
Published: April 29, 2010
WASHINGTON � A coalition of top Senate Democrats laid out the contours of a proposed overhaul of immigration laws on Thursday � and appealed to Republicans to join them in pursuing it � even as doubts mounted about the prospects of winning approval of legislation this year.
Under the outline of immigration changes drawn up by Senator Charles E. Schumer of New York, the No. 3 Senate Democrat, the federal government would enhance border security and create a new fraud-resistant Social Security card.
Illegal immigrants who wish to remain in this country would have to admit they had broken the law, pay back taxes and fees, and pass a criminal background check to qualify for legal residency after eight years.
�Our immigration system is broken,� the majority leader, Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, said late Thursday afternoon at a packed news conference. �We�re offering this framework as an invitation, an invitation to our Republican colleagues to work with us to solve this problem that has plagued our country for too long.�
Even as the Democratic senators were still speaking, President Obama issued a statement praising the proposal as �an important step,� and he warned that lack of federal action would �leave the door open to a patchwork of actions at the state and local level that are inconsistent and, as we have seen recently, often misguided.�
Mr. Obama�s statement was a reference to the tough new law recently enacted in Arizona that many Democrats view as draconian and that helped prompt Democrats to take on the immigration issue sooner than some had planned.
�What has become increasingly clear,� Mr. Obama said, �is that we can no longer wait to fix our broken immigration system, which Democrats and Republicans alike agree doesn�t work.�
The statement contrasted with comments he made to reporters a day earlier on Air Force One, in which he suggested that Congress might not have the appetite for an immigration overhaul.
At the news conference, Democratic leaders said they were presenting the legislative framework in hopes of persuading Republicans to collaborate on the issue. They are also looking to sound out skeptical Democrats to gauge the prospects for support.
House Democrats have said they will not act unless the Senate moves first.
Mr. Reid, who is facing a difficult re-election fight back home, first put the issue back on the Congressional agenda a few weeks ago when he told a pro-immigration rally in Las Vegas that he intended to pursue legislation, a stance that caught many in Washington off guard.
Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, the chief Republican negotiating with Democrats on the issue, dropped out of the talks, saying he was angry that Mr. Reid seemed to be giving immigration priority over a climate bill.
At the news conference Mr. Reid said it was �not logical to use immigration as an excuse to not help on energy.� But he also said Democrats were not directing their message at Mr. Graham.
�There are 40 other Republicans,� he said.
On Thursday, the House Republican leader, Representative John A. Boehner of Ohio, flatly predicted that Congress would not send an immigration measure to the president this year. Mr. Boehner accused Democrats of engaging in a �cynical ploy to try to engage voters, some segment of voters, to show up in this November�s elections.�
�There is not a chance that immigration is going to move through the Congress,� he said.
But Mr. Schumer, who is now chairman of a subcommittee on immigration long headed by the late Senator Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts, said he believed there was a possibility of success.
Mr. Schumer hailed his approach as a way to combine border security and improvements in the American work force while providing a chance for millions of people living illegally in the United States to gain legal status and pay taxes.
And Mr. Schumer, who is known for his ambition in both the political and policy arenas, drew loud laughter when he said that he would not have accepted the subcommittee gavel if he had thought otherwise.
�If I did not believe we could accomplish immigration reform, I never would have chosen to accept the immigration subcommittee chairmanship,� he said. �Committees of inaction and legislative backwaters are not places in which I thrive.�
Democrats acknowledge, however, facing a difficult task considering that President George W. Bush, was unable to persuade enough of his fellow Republicans to back immigration changes in 2007, and the effort collapsed.
A version of this article appeared in print on April 30, 2010, on page A12 of the New York edition.
Democrats Outline Plans for Immigration Changes
By CARL HULSE and DAVID M. HERSZENHORN
Published: April 29, 2010
WASHINGTON � A coalition of top Senate Democrats laid out the contours of a proposed overhaul of immigration laws on Thursday � and appealed to Republicans to join them in pursuing it � even as doubts mounted about the prospects of winning approval of legislation this year.
Under the outline of immigration changes drawn up by Senator Charles E. Schumer of New York, the No. 3 Senate Democrat, the federal government would enhance border security and create a new fraud-resistant Social Security card.
Illegal immigrants who wish to remain in this country would have to admit they had broken the law, pay back taxes and fees, and pass a criminal background check to qualify for legal residency after eight years.
�Our immigration system is broken,� the majority leader, Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, said late Thursday afternoon at a packed news conference. �We�re offering this framework as an invitation, an invitation to our Republican colleagues to work with us to solve this problem that has plagued our country for too long.�
Even as the Democratic senators were still speaking, President Obama issued a statement praising the proposal as �an important step,� and he warned that lack of federal action would �leave the door open to a patchwork of actions at the state and local level that are inconsistent and, as we have seen recently, often misguided.�
Mr. Obama�s statement was a reference to the tough new law recently enacted in Arizona that many Democrats view as draconian and that helped prompt Democrats to take on the immigration issue sooner than some had planned.
�What has become increasingly clear,� Mr. Obama said, �is that we can no longer wait to fix our broken immigration system, which Democrats and Republicans alike agree doesn�t work.�
The statement contrasted with comments he made to reporters a day earlier on Air Force One, in which he suggested that Congress might not have the appetite for an immigration overhaul.
At the news conference, Democratic leaders said they were presenting the legislative framework in hopes of persuading Republicans to collaborate on the issue. They are also looking to sound out skeptical Democrats to gauge the prospects for support.
House Democrats have said they will not act unless the Senate moves first.
Mr. Reid, who is facing a difficult re-election fight back home, first put the issue back on the Congressional agenda a few weeks ago when he told a pro-immigration rally in Las Vegas that he intended to pursue legislation, a stance that caught many in Washington off guard.
Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, the chief Republican negotiating with Democrats on the issue, dropped out of the talks, saying he was angry that Mr. Reid seemed to be giving immigration priority over a climate bill.
At the news conference Mr. Reid said it was �not logical to use immigration as an excuse to not help on energy.� But he also said Democrats were not directing their message at Mr. Graham.
�There are 40 other Republicans,� he said.
On Thursday, the House Republican leader, Representative John A. Boehner of Ohio, flatly predicted that Congress would not send an immigration measure to the president this year. Mr. Boehner accused Democrats of engaging in a �cynical ploy to try to engage voters, some segment of voters, to show up in this November�s elections.�
�There is not a chance that immigration is going to move through the Congress,� he said.
But Mr. Schumer, who is now chairman of a subcommittee on immigration long headed by the late Senator Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts, said he believed there was a possibility of success.
Mr. Schumer hailed his approach as a way to combine border security and improvements in the American work force while providing a chance for millions of people living illegally in the United States to gain legal status and pay taxes.
And Mr. Schumer, who is known for his ambition in both the political and policy arenas, drew loud laughter when he said that he would not have accepted the subcommittee gavel if he had thought otherwise.
�If I did not believe we could accomplish immigration reform, I never would have chosen to accept the immigration subcommittee chairmanship,� he said. �Committees of inaction and legislative backwaters are not places in which I thrive.�
Democrats acknowledge, however, facing a difficult task considering that President George W. Bush, was unable to persuade enough of his fellow Republicans to back immigration changes in 2007, and the effort collapsed.
A version of this article appeared in print on April 30, 2010, on page A12 of the New York edition.
blueyonder
07-15 04:51 PM
Could someone let me know how much you paid at this clinic for Medical checkup and immunization shots.
For me they charged as below,
Medical & Blood test - 225$
MMR - 115$
Td - 115$
Vericella - 115$
They also asked us to take Hepatitis blood test which cost 80$
Hepatitis shot - 115$
Total = 765$ for one person
They do not accept medical insurance, for me and my wife I paid 1530$.
After completing all these shots they gave us the sealed envelop, and a copy of I-693 (Green color - Applicant's copy).
Under remarks it says:
The applicant hasn't met all the recommended vaccines; thus, I have encouraged to continue or follow-up with the additional doeses. He is fully aware and will proceed.
Further they put us on a schedule (Texas Health Department - Immunization Division) which involves taking,
2 more hepatitis shot
2 more Td
1 more MMR
1 more Varicella
Which is going to cost 690$ more. Which would be 765$ + 690$ = 1455$ / person.
They say that INS while calling for interview will ask for the immunization record, and all the above shots should be upto date by then.
I saw many people from Austin going to this clinic (Near Hongkong Market) and I would like to know if everyone paid the same.
Thanks.
For me they charged as below,
Medical & Blood test - 225$
MMR - 115$
Td - 115$
Vericella - 115$
They also asked us to take Hepatitis blood test which cost 80$
Hepatitis shot - 115$
Total = 765$ for one person
They do not accept medical insurance, for me and my wife I paid 1530$.
After completing all these shots they gave us the sealed envelop, and a copy of I-693 (Green color - Applicant's copy).
Under remarks it says:
The applicant hasn't met all the recommended vaccines; thus, I have encouraged to continue or follow-up with the additional doeses. He is fully aware and will proceed.
Further they put us on a schedule (Texas Health Department - Immunization Division) which involves taking,
2 more hepatitis shot
2 more Td
1 more MMR
1 more Varicella
Which is going to cost 690$ more. Which would be 765$ + 690$ = 1455$ / person.
They say that INS while calling for interview will ask for the immunization record, and all the above shots should be upto date by then.
I saw many people from Austin going to this clinic (Near Hongkong Market) and I would like to know if everyone paid the same.
Thanks.
more...
felix31
09-20 02:11 PM
we have lots of users today....:D :D
anyone who recently registered?
anyone who recently registered?
2010 High Res Cannabis
sands_14
08-01 02:50 PM
The count is on....
Lets see who all make it...;)
Lets see who all make it...;)
more...
utibrewal
07-07 09:03 PM
http://online.wsj.com/article_print/SB118359095890657571.html
hair marijuana plants wallpaper -
mbawa2574
07-03 10:16 PM
Another help from your favorite administration in screwing your life.. Obama clearly wants to reduce the influence of indian community but our people are idiots....
more...
shukla77
06-17 10:48 AM
Any recommendation for doctor in Long Island, Queens, Brooklyn area?
hot cannabis wallpaper. cannabis wallpaper. weed wallpaper for snoop; weed
subh21
09-28 09:06 PM
Hi Pappu and Admins.
Thanks for the good work.
(*based on data from USCIS)
Your position is 3686 in the Green Card Queue based on your Country of Chargeability "India", Priority Date "Feb-04" and Category "EB3" .
Your Expected Date of Adjudication is Jan, 2011.
(*based on data from USCIS website September 2009)
Result for patiently_waiting:
Your position is 24486 in the Green Card Queue based on your Country of Chargeability "India", Priority Date "Feb-04" and Category "EB3" .
Your Expected Date of Adjudication is Jun, 2018.
*******************************************
I can understand how the tracker gave 24486 (based on pdf provided by USCIS recently).
How the tracker arrived at 3686 based on my priority date ?
Can someone please explain ?
Thanks a lot.
Here is the part the math doesn't make sense to me, I ran the tool with IV data and I have 4639 people ahead of me in GC queue (my Priority date is Mar-06 EB2 India), and when I run the tool with USCIS data, it says correctly ~ 21953 folks ahead of me. Looking at the USCIS published data on there site (which is posted August 25th 2009, and probably doesn't include the recent approvals), there are approximately 7000 EB2-I cases pending till January 2005, which is where the visa bulletin cut-off date is. Assuming all 7000 cleared in September 09 and IV data is the most recent, there should be at least ~15000 ahead of me!
I do not understand how the 10000 or so 2005 folks are missing form the IV data, when they were never current between USCIS published data and IV procured data.
Can someone shed some light? :confused:
Thanks for the good work.
(*based on data from USCIS)
Your position is 3686 in the Green Card Queue based on your Country of Chargeability "India", Priority Date "Feb-04" and Category "EB3" .
Your Expected Date of Adjudication is Jan, 2011.
(*based on data from USCIS website September 2009)
Result for patiently_waiting:
Your position is 24486 in the Green Card Queue based on your Country of Chargeability "India", Priority Date "Feb-04" and Category "EB3" .
Your Expected Date of Adjudication is Jun, 2018.
*******************************************
I can understand how the tracker gave 24486 (based on pdf provided by USCIS recently).
How the tracker arrived at 3686 based on my priority date ?
Can someone please explain ?
Thanks a lot.
Here is the part the math doesn't make sense to me, I ran the tool with IV data and I have 4639 people ahead of me in GC queue (my Priority date is Mar-06 EB2 India), and when I run the tool with USCIS data, it says correctly ~ 21953 folks ahead of me. Looking at the USCIS published data on there site (which is posted August 25th 2009, and probably doesn't include the recent approvals), there are approximately 7000 EB2-I cases pending till January 2005, which is where the visa bulletin cut-off date is. Assuming all 7000 cleared in September 09 and IV data is the most recent, there should be at least ~15000 ahead of me!
I do not understand how the 10000 or so 2005 folks are missing form the IV data, when they were never current between USCIS published data and IV procured data.
Can someone shed some light? :confused:
more...
house VOILA MON WINDOWS CANNABIS
arunkotte
06-15 09:08 AM
Anyone is in Memphis, TN for medical
Yes, I am from Memphis, TN, Whats up? did you take your Appointment, Did you find out how much they are charging around here?
Yes, I am from Memphis, TN, Whats up? did you take your Appointment, Did you find out how much they are charging around here?
tattoo phone Wallpaper. Cannabis
ameryki
11-02 08:32 PM
Guys, I would like to visit India later this month for a cousin's wedding (booked tickets to India on 28th of this month). Had neglected to file AP extension earlier and than my lawyer screwed up and delayed it by a month.... Application was mailed on the 16th Oct and received on the 19th (receipt date is 19th Oct). Based on how its worked out for most of you I should be getting my AP soon, but who knows....just keeping my fingers crossed.
Any other path I could pursue to expediate the process? Really need to be in India end of this month...though it cannot really be classified as an emergency.
why go through a lawyer for AP you could have efiled and saved yourself this headache. now the only option is wait and watch mate
Any other path I could pursue to expediate the process? Really need to be in India end of this month...though it cannot really be classified as an emergency.
why go through a lawyer for AP you could have efiled and saved yourself this headache. now the only option is wait and watch mate
more...
pictures cannabis wallpaper. cannabis wallpaper. Weed+joint+wallpaper
MDix
09-29 12:36 PM
Is IV Planning any action for the wrong Data provided by USCIS under USCIS/FOIA request?
dresses wallpaper weed wallpaper.
pal351
07-30 12:21 PM
House Immigration Sub-Committee is planning on mark up Congresswoman Lofgren's recapture bill tomorrow (Thursday) afternoon in her subcommittee. This is an extremely IMPORTANT development. We are hoping that an agreement reached such that there is no party line vote on this effort. As such all members are requested to PLEASE PLEASE call the following members on the subcommittee requesting them to support Lofgren's recapture bill H.R.5882.
Majority Members (Democrats)
Member Name DC Phone
Luis V. Gutierrez (D-IL) 202-225-8203
Howard L. Berman (D-CA) 202-225-4695
Sheila Jackson-Lee (D-TX) 202-225-3816
Maxine Waters (D-CA) 202-225-2201
Bill Delahunt (D-MA) 202-225-3111
Linda T. Sanchez (D-CA) 202-225-6676
Artur Davis (D-AL) 202-225-2665
Keith Ellison (D-MN) 202-225-4755
Anthony Weiner (D-NY) 202-225-6616
Minority Members (Republicans)
Member Name DC Phone
Steve King (R-IA) [Ranking Member]202-225-4426
Elton Gallegly (R-CA) 202-225-5811
Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) 202-225-5431
Dan Lungren (R-CA) 202-225-5716
J. Randy Forbes (R-VA) 202-225-6365
Louie Gohmert (R-TX) 202-225-3035
I called following people and requested to support this bill
Member Name DC Phone
Luis V. Gutierrez (D-IL) 202-225-8203
Howard L. Berman (D-CA) 202-225-4695
Sheila Jackson-Lee (D-TX) 202-225-3816
Maxine Waters (D-CA) 202-225-2201
Bill Delahunt (D-MA) 202-225-3111
Linda T. Sanchez (D-CA) 202-225-6676
Artur Davis (D-AL) 202-225-2665
Keith Ellison (D-MN) 202-225-4755
Anthony Weiner (D-NY) 202-225-6616
Please everybody call them its only matter of 10 min.
Thanks.
Majority Members (Democrats)
Member Name DC Phone
Luis V. Gutierrez (D-IL) 202-225-8203
Howard L. Berman (D-CA) 202-225-4695
Sheila Jackson-Lee (D-TX) 202-225-3816
Maxine Waters (D-CA) 202-225-2201
Bill Delahunt (D-MA) 202-225-3111
Linda T. Sanchez (D-CA) 202-225-6676
Artur Davis (D-AL) 202-225-2665
Keith Ellison (D-MN) 202-225-4755
Anthony Weiner (D-NY) 202-225-6616
Minority Members (Republicans)
Member Name DC Phone
Steve King (R-IA) [Ranking Member]202-225-4426
Elton Gallegly (R-CA) 202-225-5811
Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) 202-225-5431
Dan Lungren (R-CA) 202-225-5716
J. Randy Forbes (R-VA) 202-225-6365
Louie Gohmert (R-TX) 202-225-3035
I called following people and requested to support this bill
Member Name DC Phone
Luis V. Gutierrez (D-IL) 202-225-8203
Howard L. Berman (D-CA) 202-225-4695
Sheila Jackson-Lee (D-TX) 202-225-3816
Maxine Waters (D-CA) 202-225-2201
Bill Delahunt (D-MA) 202-225-3111
Linda T. Sanchez (D-CA) 202-225-6676
Artur Davis (D-AL) 202-225-2665
Keith Ellison (D-MN) 202-225-4755
Anthony Weiner (D-NY) 202-225-6616
Please everybody call them its only matter of 10 min.
Thanks.
more...
makeup wallpaper marijuana.
sats123
01-26 09:23 AM
Well, compare that with when you get passed over for promotion because of your skin color or you dont get to lead the meatiest projects because of your race. And I am talking about management jobs here, not the IT/software/programming types.
I don't agree with you, I work for a pretty big company. There are many directors and VPs who are indians. Depends on the person's caliber.
I don't agree with you, I work for a pretty big company. There are many directors and VPs who are indians. Depends on the person's caliber.
girlfriend cannabis wallpaper. leaf ackground wallpaper; leaf ackground wallpaper.
desi76
04-02 11:46 AM
Washington Dulles.
hairstyles Wallpapers Categories
simple1
09-02 04:09 PM
How does delinquent FBAR for multiple years work ?
- send multiple forms for each year
or
- send in the latest (FY2008).
Can some one advice ?
- send multiple forms for each year
or
- send in the latest (FY2008).
Can some one advice ?
sravani
05-10 11:50 AM
Quick update on my case:
My attorney submitted the RFE response today by Fedex. She submitted the University letter and Trustforte Academic evaluation. She said she is confident about this evidence we submitted. I am incredibly nervous....
My attorney submitted the RFE response today by Fedex. She submitted the University letter and Trustforte Academic evaluation. She said she is confident about this evidence we submitted. I am incredibly nervous....
gcformeornot
09-28 03:11 PM
too. I changed my PD close to current visa bulletin. I changed category to EB2
FOIA calculation was realistic Aug2010. But USCIS calculation was way off something like Aug2012 :confused:
FOIA calculation was realistic Aug2010. But USCIS calculation was way off something like Aug2012 :confused:
No comments:
Post a Comment